Chapter 9: Cowpea Breeding

Arti Singh; Teshale Mamo; Asheesh Singh; and Anthony A. Mahama

Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp.) (2n=2x=22) belongs to the Leguminosae family. Cowpea is an important legume crop ranked second after groundnut. It is grown for food and feed in multiple continents (Africa, Asia, Europe, the United States, and Central and South America). The center of origin and domestication is Southern Africa from where is was later carried to East and West Africa and Asia. Wild relatives of cowpea are found all over Africa. With grain comprised of 25% protein and several minerals and vitamins, it is another important crop that is vital for tackling current global food security challenges facing the world.

Learning Objectives
  • Become familiar with the Cowpea crop
  • List breeding institutions working on it
  • Know classification system
  • Describe adaptation and usage
  • Outline production constraints
  • Discuss breeding method used to develop pureline cowpea cultivars
  • Outline a step by step breeding procedure using CB-27 cowpea cultivar as an example

Domestication and Diversification

Cowpea was domesticated in southern Africa and later spread to East and West Africa and Asia. Baudoin and Marechal (1985) classified domesticated cowpea into five cultivar groups (cultigroups).

  1. Unguiculata (seed testa thick and shiny) is the major group.
  2. Textilis (long inflorescence peduncle) is mostly found in West Africa.
  3. Sesquipedalis (fleshy pod, wrinkled when ripe) is mainly found in East Africa.
  4. Melanophthalmus (seed testa thin & often wrinkled, flower & seed partly white) originated in West Africa.
  5. Biflora (seed testa thick and shiny, flower and seed most often colored) is grown in South East Asia.

Biology of the Crop

General Characteristics and Development of the Crop

A photo displaying the wide variety of color (black, white, creamy white, green, orange, red) and shape (round, oval, kidney-shaped) of cowpea seeds.
Fig. 1 Cowpea exhibits diverse seed color, shape, size, and texture. Photo by J.D. Ehlers; cited in M.P. Timko et al., 2007.

Cowpea is a warm-season, annual, herbaceous and similar in appearance to common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) except that the leaves are generally darker green, shinier, and rarely pubescent. It has twining stems varying in erectness and bushiness. The trifoliate leaves develop alternatively, and petioles are 2 to 12 cm long. A wider range exists for leaf shape and size in cowpea than in common bean.

Plant growth habit is categorized as erect to semi-erect, prostrate (trailing type) or climbing, and indeterminate to determinate, depending on the genotype. However, most cowpea accessions have the indeterminate type of growth habit. Cowpea has a strong taproot system and the depth of the root has been measured up to 95 inches after 8 weeks of seeding. Flowers are born in axillary racemes on stalks with 15 to 30 cm peduncles. Usually, a single peduncle has two to three pods, however, under favorable growing conditions, a single peduncle often carries four or more pods. The presence of long peduncles is a unique feature of cowpea among legumes, and this characteristic facilitates hand harvesting. The cowpea flowers vary in color from white, cream and yellow to purple, and the seeds, which are smooth or wrinkled, range in color from white, cream or yellow to red, and are characterized by a marked hilum surrounded by a dark arc (Fig. 1).

Photosynthesis, Photoperiod, and Temperature

Cowpea is a short-day plant and like other grain legumes, cowpea processes its food using a C3 photosynthetic pathway. Different cowpea genotypes show photoperiod sensitivity in connection with floral bud initiation and development. Some genotypes are day-neutral, while other genotypes display a wider range of photoperiods (Craufurd et al. 1997). In addition, few cowpea genotypes exhibit various degrees of sensitivity to photoperiod (extent of delay in flowering) and temperature (Ehlers and Hall 1996). Warmer temperatures speed up flowering time in both photoperiod sensitive and insensitive cowpea genotypes. The development of improved cowpea genotypes for warm environments requires an understanding of the developmental responses to heat and photoperiod. Cowpea cultivars show a wide range of reproductive characteristics. The flower initiation ranges from 30 to 90 days after planting, and attaining physiological maturity (dry seed maturity) ranges from 55 to 240 days after planting (Wien and Summerfield, 1984). Wien and Summerfield (1984) reported that cowpea cultivars that flower early have a shorter or more concentrated flowering period than cultivars that flower late. In Sub-Saharan Africa, selection for different degrees of photosensitivity has occurred in different climatic zones and this resulted in pod ripening coinciding with the rainy season in some given locations. This condition helps the plant during pod set and ripening to escape damage from excessive rainfall and diseases attack. Therefore, photoperiod and temperature responses of particular cowpea genotypes allow cowpea breeders to make parental choices to best utilize exotic and adapted germplasm to serve particular environments.

General Classification

Classification by Utilization or Mode of Consumption

Cowpea is used as food as well as feed, including forage, hay and silage for livestock in Sub-Saharan Africa, Asia, Europe, USA and Central and South America. In Africa, people consume young leaves, immature pods, immature seeds and dried seeds. The stems, leaves, and vines of the cowpea serve as animal feed. Cowpea is also used as green manure and cover crop for maintaining the productivity of the soil. The grain contains 25% protein and several vitamins, minerals and fibers. Breeding efforts at the International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA) and national programs have resulted in dual-purpose varieties (with good grain and fodder yields). The dual-purpose varieties have provided both grain and fodder while fitting the different cropping systems, economic, and climatic conditions encountered in Africa. In addition, cowpea has great flexibility in terms of its use as farmers can choose to harvest the cowpea for grains or for forage to feed their livestock, depending on economic or climatic conditions.

Classification by Seed Characteristics

Cowpea seed size ranges from small wild types to 0.5-1 cm long. The 1000 seed weight of cowpea is 150-300 grams. Most of the time, seeds develop a kidney shape if not restricted within the pod. If the development of seed is restricted by the pod, the seed becomes more globular. The seed coat in cowpea can either be smooth or wrinkled and an assortment of colors has been observed (including white, cream, green, buff, red, brown and black). Sometimes, the seed is either speckled or mottled. Many of the cowpea seeds are also referred to as eye bean (black eye, pinkeye purple hull) (Fig 2) where they are covered with a white tissue, with a blackish rim-like aril. In cowpea, the seed size is important because it directly influences productivity, and together with different color standards, can determine grain quality for the market. Therefore, seed size and color should also be considered as major traits of interest for breeding programs.

Seeds of popular blackeye cowpea showing black rim-like aril around the hilum.
Fig. 2 Popular blackeye bean seed (Credit Toby Hudson, in Heuzé V.Tran G., 2015)

In the United States, different cowpea cultivar classes with a broad range in characteristics are grown for horticultural use. All cultivars that are grown in USA are day neutral members of the subspecies Unguiculata cultivar group Unguiculata. The cultivars grown for seed are classified as Blackeye beans, are known for good yield production), the Crowders type are known for their largest peas, and are often used for canning. Cream peas are the most popular and have become increasingly important for home gardening, while field types have few popular cultivars and most cultivars are old agronomic types.

Classification by Growth Habit

Cowpea has substantial genetic diversity for growth habit. The major growth habits are categorized as erect to semi-erect, prostrate (trailing) or climbing types. Growth habit in cowpea ranges from indeterminate to fairly determinate with the non-vining types tending to be more determinate. Meanwhile, some of the early maturing groups have a determinate growth types.

Classification by duration of Growth Period

Cowpea is grouped into early, medium and late maturity group. However, the range for growth-period duration varies from one region to another or among varieties of different growth habits. According to growth habit and region, cowpea cultivars range from 55 to 240 days to physiologically mature. The difference is not only varietal but also environmental, especially for the factors of day-length and temperature.

Adaptation and Economic Importance and Uses

Adaption

Cowpea is widely cultivated throughout the tropics and subtropics between 35°N and 30°S, across Africa, Asia and Oceania, the Middle East, Southern Europe, Southern USA and Central and South America. Cowpea is a crop adapted to hot and dry tropical conditions. It is also considered drought tolerant compared to other legumes. They grow best at low altitude with a precipitation of 400 to 700 mm per annum. Optimum crop production requires temperatures between 20-35°C during the growing season, and soil pH between 5.5 and 8.3. Cowpea is grown on a wide range of soil textures but the crop shows preference to sandy soil. It has low tolerance to salt but somewhat tolerant to aluminium. Like other legumes, the crop does not withstand waterlogged or flooded conditions. Cowpea is sensitive to chilling conditions. The crop is grown in 45 countries across the globe. An estimated 14 million ha is planted to cowpea each year across the globe with total annual production of about 6 million MT, the current average is estimated at about 0.45 tonnes/ha (FAOSTAT, 2010). The production trend of cowpea across the world is shown in a Fig. 3. Cowpea is primarily an African crop. The largest producers are Nigeria, Niger, Brazil, Haiti, India, Myanmar, Sri Lanka, Australia and the United States. Among these high cowpea producing countries, Nigeria and Niger each grow over 4 million ha and account for 45% and 15%, respectively, of the total world production (FAOSTAT, 2010).

Cowpea in the Human Diet and Nutrition

Graph of cowpea showing increasing world world trends of area under production in millions of hectares (Ha) (blue line), production in metric tons (MT) (lower red line), and yield in kg/Ha (green bars) from 1969 to 2007.
Fig. 3 Cowpea world trends. Illustration by Abate et al., 2012.

Cowpea is one of the most widely used legumes in the tropical parts of the world. It can be used at all growth stages as a vegetable crop. The grain is mainly used for human nutrition, making cowpea one of the most important dual purpose legumes. The nutritional content of cowpea grain is comparable to common beans, with relative low fat content. The protein in cowpea grains is rich in tryptophan compared to cereal grains. In Africa, immature green pods are used similar to snap bean in common bean.

Cropping System

Cowpea grows well in association with cereal crops through intercropping. Cowpea is a major component of the traditional cropping system in Africa, Asia, and Central and South America, where it is mainly grown with other crops in various combinations. It is grown as a millet-cowpea mixture (exhibit 22% of the field sampled), a predominant crop mixture system in the Sudan savanna of Nigeria (Henriet et al., 1997). In the dry savanna cropping system, millets have been grown with different crop mixtures including millet-sorghum-cowpea (represent 19%), sorghum-cowpea (10%) and millet-cowpea-groundnut (8 %) (Olufajo and Singh, 2002). Cowpea grain yield in the mixture is lower than under sole crop condition. The factors contributing to low yields under intercropping systems include low plant population, shading effects, and competition for nutrients. Cowpea is also used as green manure, where it is incorporated into soil and can provide nitrogen to subsequent crops, minimize soil erosion and suppresses weeds.

Production Constraints

Biotic Constraints

Several biotic factors that cause yield reduction in cowpea include insect pests, fungal, bacterial, viral diseases, plant parasites, other organisms.

  • Insect Pests – Aphids are the main insect pests of cowpea, and are important vectors of cowpea mosaic virus. Other insect pests attacking cowpea are flower thrips and pod borers.
  • Diseases – Cowpea diseases are due to fungi, bacteria and viruses. Examples of diseases include, Cercospora leaf spot, ashy stem blight, bacterial blight, blackeye cowpea mosaic polyvirus (BICMV), and cowpea mosaic comovirus.
  • Plant Parasites – Certain weeds are important in cowpea production and most notable examples are the parasitic weedy plants Striga and Alectra.
  • Nematodes – Nematode also causes root damage to the crop and result in significant yield loss.

Abiotic Constraints

Extreme drought and heat, soil acidity, low phosphorous are some of the abiotic factors that limit the yield of cowpea.

International Breeding Centers

The International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA) has a global mandate for the development and improvement of cowpea. Its main duty and responsibility is to develop and distribute improved cowpea varieties to over 65 national cowpea research programs in Africa. Variety requirements for cowpea differ from region to region in respect of the seed color preference, use patterns, maturity and growth habit. Therefore, IITA located additional scientists and breeding centers in Philippines, Nigeria, Burkina Faso, Cameroon, Congo and Brazil in order to address the regional constraints in cowpea production at the global level.

A general strategy for IITA is to develop different cowpea breeding lines with diverse maturity (to feed specific adaptation across wide agro-ecological zones where cowpea is grown), plant type, and seed types combined with resistance to major biotic (diseases, insect-pests, and weeds) and abiotic (drought, heat and low phosphorous) stresses.

IITA’s genetic resources account for the world’s largest and most diverse pool of cowpea germplasm. The collection consists of over 15,000 cultivated varieties from over 100 countries, and 560 accessions of wild cowpeas (Singh et al., 1997). The IITA collection constitutes a valuable resource for the cowpea improvement worldwide. Scientists from IITA center and regional centers have identified various cowpea genotypes with numerous desirable genes, which govern plant architecture and physiological traits (like plant type, root architecture, growth habit, pod traits, seed traits, photosensitivity, maturity and nitrogen fixation), quality traits (fodder quality and grain quality), abiotic stress (heat and drought tolerances), biotic stress (resistance to major bacterial, fungal and viral diseases, resistance to rootknot nematodes, resistance to aphids, bruchid, thrips, and resistance to parasitic weeds such as Striga gesneriodes, and Alectra vogelii).

Breeding Methods and Strategies

Introduction

Cowpea is a true diploid species with a chromosome number of 2n = 2x = 22. It is primarily a self-pollinating crop in most production environments, although up to 5% outcrossing can occur in some environments, possibly associated with pollen transfer by insects. Different cowpea breeding programs have their own priority of target production zones including the cropping systems, consumption preferences and major constraints to cowpea production in their agro-ecological zones.

Most Cowpea breeders at IITA and National programs use bulk, backcross, and pedigree breeding methods to deal with large numbers of segregating populations because cowpea is an autogamous crop and most cultivars grown by farmers are pure lines. The primary objective in all cowpea breeding programs is higher grain yield and improved grain quality. In addition, to yield and quality traits, most breeders seek to breed in a wide range of abiotic and biotic stress resistance traits. The breeding strategy of IITA and regional breeding program is to develop broad range of breeding lines with high yield and adapted to different agro-ecological zones that possess regionally preferred characters for plant type, growth habit, days to maturity, seed type, combined with resistance to biotic and abiotic stress, along with quality. In general, the main focus of breeding programs is to develop extra early maturity (60-70 days) and medium maturity (75-90 days), non-photosensitive lines with good grain quality and possibility for dual purpose use, either for use as sole crop or as intercrop in multiple cropping systems.

Example of Cultivar Development

Development of Blackeye Cowpea Cultivar “CB27” at University of California Riverside

California Blackeye 27 (CB27) was developed by the University of California, Riverside (UCR) following the protocol shown in Fig. 4, and released in 1999 for its better performance in the following characteristics:

  1. High yielding
  2. Reproductive-stage heat tolerance
  3. Broad-based resistance to Fusarium wilt
  4. Broad-based resistance to root-knot nematodes
  5. Semi-dwarf and less vegetative shoot biomass
  6. Bright white seed coat
  7. Good seed weight
  8. Non-leaky pigments during boiling and excellent canning quality.
A flowchart showing the protocol followed over the years from 1981 to 1996 during development of cowpea cultivar CB27.
Fig. 4 Flow Chart for the Development of Blackeye Cowpea Cultivar “CB27”

Actual data from Preliminary Yield Trials (PYT), Advanced Yield Trials (AYT) and Uniform Yield Trials (UYT) along with different test conducted on agronomic, disease and quality traits (from 1989 – 1998) led to the development of CB-27. Tables 1 – 20 show the results of various trials and years in which they were conducted to eventually release CB-27.

Note: all cells in Tables 1-20 with “n/a” are blank cells.

Year – 1989

Table 1 Preliminary Blackeye Trials at Kearney Agricultural Center (KAC), 1989; H = Heat Tolerance.
Entry Origin Score Yield (lbs/acre) Seed weight g/100
H8-14 336 x 1393 H 3281 24.5
H8-9 336 x 1393 H 3236 24.7
H8-8 336 x 1393 n/a 3152 23.5
H8-7 336 x 1393 H 3022 25.9
H8-4 336 x 1393 H 2861 23.6
CB5 n/a n/a 2995 26.3
CB46 n/a n/a 3017 21.5
LSD n/a n/a 715 13
CV (%) n/a n/a 16.2 3.4

Year – 1990

Table 2 Advanced Blackeye Trials at University of California Riverside (UCR), 1990.
Entry Origin Yield (lbs/acre) Seed weight (mg) Seed density g/cm3 Lodging Earliness Vigor
H8-14 336 x 1393 1805 235 1.10 erect early compact
H8-9 336 x 1393 1805 248 1.09 erect early compact
H8-8 336 x 1393 1497 233 1.11 erect early compact
CB5 CB x Iron 1889 254 1.06 erect med moderate
CB46 CB5 x 166146 2274 224 1.09 erect med moderate
LSD.05 n/a 266 10 0.03 n/a n/a n/a
CV (%) n/a> 10 3 2 n/a n/a n/a

Year – 1991

Year – 1992

Table 10 Screening for Heat Tolerance data, 1992.
Line Total #
of Sub-lines
# Heat Tolerance – Flowering
(CVARS & GH)
Heat Tolerance – % Podding
(Hot Glasshouse at UCR)
# Selected
sublines
Average Podding
H8-14 45 26 57 9 4.7
H8-9 54 54 92 14 9.4
H8-8 46 24 70 12 5.0

 

Table 11 Summer glasshouse evaluation results for associations among heat Tolerance and Resistance to Root Knot Nematode (non-aggressive Meloidogyne incogonita); day/night temperatures of 34/30 degree centigrade, 1992.
Line 1Nematode Resistance #2Heat Tolerance – Floral buds #2Heat Tolerance – Pod set
H8-8-1 R N 3
H8-8-2 S S
H8-8-3 R N 6
H8-8-4 S S
H8-8-5 R N 2
H8-8-6 S S
H8-8-8 R N 0
H8-8-9 R N 7
H8-8-10 R N 0
-to- n/a n/a n/a
—- n/a n/a n/a
H-8-8-27 R N n/a

Year – 1993

The blackeye cowpea cultivators follow three management schemes:

  1. Single-flush main crop cut after ~ 100 days
  2. Single-flush double crop, sown later and cut after ~ 100 days
  3. Double-flush main crop, sown early and cut after ~ 140 days

Short-term goal – to develop blackeye varieties with resistance to the:

  1. common race of Fusarium wilt in California (race #3)
  2. wide range of root knot nematodes
  3. heat tolerance
  4. increased yield potential

Medium-term goal – to develop blackeye varieties that have resistance to early cut-out and greater ability to produce pods over an extended season (140 days from planting to cutting)

Long-term goal – resistance to lygus, resistance to cowpea aphid

Table 12 Mean non-aggressive Meloidogyne incognita egg mass count from four to five replicates on breeding lines using “pouch” tests, 1993.  R indicates resistant, S indicates susceptible, and – indicates not tested.
Line Date of Test
13-May 27-Feb 25-Aug R/S
CB5 2 n/a n/a R
CB46 2 n/a n/a R
H-8-8-2 2 0 n/a R
H-8-8-4 4 <1 n/a R
H-8-8-6 <1 <1 0 R
H-8-8-8 2 0 n/a R
H-8-8-13 0 0 0 R
H-8-8-15 0 0 0 R
H-8-8-16 10 0 0 R
H-8-8-27 <1 <1 <1 R
H-8-8-28 5 n/a n/a R
H-8-8-30 0 n/a n/a R
H-8-8-32 43 n/a n/a S
H-8-8-35 0 <1 <1 R
Table 13 Mean non-aggressive Meloidogyne incognita egg mass count from four to five replicates on breeding lines using “pouch” tests, in Advanced Yield Trial, 1993.  R indicates resistant, S indicates susceptible, and – indicates not tested.  
Line Date of Test Classification
May 13 April 9 Aggressive Non-aggressive
CB3 32 190 S S
CB46 15 24 S R
H-8-8-2 6 n/a R R
H-8-8-4 n/a 4 R R
H-8-8-6 7 12 R R
H-8-8-8 n/a 17 R R
H-8-8-13 2 29 R R
H-8-8-15 6 7 R R
H-8-8-16 11 20 R R
H-8-8-27 2 31 R R
H-8-8-31 n/a 85 S S
H-8-8-35 8 22 S R
Table 14 Heat–tolerance results of advanced blackeye breeding lines evaluated in a hot glasshouse (day/night temperature of 35/30 degree Celsius) and Coachella Valley Research Station, 1993. – indicates not tested.
Entry Grain Yield g/plant Plots/Plant Seeds/Pod Seed Weight Mg/seed Flower Production Pods/Peduncle #
CB5 0 0 n/a n/a NO n/a
CB46 2 4 2.7 166 NO n/a
H8-8-6 22 28 4.2 192 YES 2.5
H-8-8-13 21 27 4.1 190 YES 2.75
H-8-8-15 22 27 4.1 196 YES 3.00
H-8-8-16 30 34 4.6 195 YES 2.75
H-8-8-27 26 30 4.2 207 YES 2.75
H-8-8-35 28 30 4.6 201 YES 2.75
Table 15 Advanced Blackeye Trial at Riverside, 1993. (Sown June 14, cut September 17 (95-day season))
Entry Grain Yield lbs/ac Seed weight mg/seed Heat tolerance Root Knot Resistance
Non-aggressive Aggressive
CB5 1975 260 SUS RES SUS
CB46 1996 225 SUS RES SUS
H8-8-6 1631 240 TOL RES RES
H-8-8-13 1951 228 TOL RES RES
H-8-8-15 1938 227 TOL RES RES
H-8-8-16 2156 231 TOL RES RES
H-8-8-27 1767 246 TOL RES RES
H-8-8-35 2049 229 TOL RES RES
LSD.05 405 22 n/a
CV% 15 6

Year – 1994

Table 16 Mean Grain Yields (lbs/ac) under single and double management in multilocation Advanced Yield Trials at UCR and KAC. a – indicates the top yielding group based on statistical analysis.
Entry Riverside Single Flush Riverside Double Flush Kearney Single Flush Kearney Double Flush Mean
CB-46 1860 2996 3046a 3916 2955
CB-5 2063 2869 2222 3479 2658
H8-8-1N 1985 3199 2629 3786 2900
H8-8-6 2039 2677 2051 3366 2531
H8-8-13 1800 2318 2637 2717 2668
H8-8-15 1703 3040 2589 3175 2627
H8-8-27 1742 2979 2398 3728 2712
H8-8-35 1771 2658 2414 3399 2561
LSD(.05) NS 581 245 NS 288
CV(%) 13 14 15 16 16
Table 17 Seed Weights (mg/seed) under single and double management in multilocation Advanced blackeye Trial at UCR and KAC, 1994.
Entry Riverside Single Flush Riverside Double Flush Kearney Single Flush Kearney Double Flush Mean
CB-46 234 211 221 211 219
CB-5 273 255 265 246 260
H8-8-1N 249 233 242 225 237
H8-8-6 243 238 230 220 233
H8-8-13 231 206 209 213 215
H8-8-15 239 227 240 218 231
H8-8-27 240 229 242 221 233
H8-8-35 237 220 234 222 228
LSD(.05) 11 12 6 13 6
CV(%) 3.1 3.6 3.9 3.9 3.6
Table 18 Plant growth habit, plant size and Pythium incidence (no. of infected plants/plot) in of entries in advanced trials at KAC and UCR and double flush advanced trial at UCR, 1994. M = medium; M-L = medium-large; L = large plants; L = low; M = medium; H = high; M-L = moderately low in vinyness.
Entry Growth habit Plant Size Growth habit vinyness Pythium
CB-46 M M-L 5.3
CB-5 L H 7.5
H8-8-1N M-L H 2.3
H8-8-6 L M 2.5
H8-8-13 M M 4.3
H8-8-15 M L 1.3
H8-8-27 M L 1.5
H8-8-35 M L 1.3
LSD(.05) n/a n/a 4.3
Table 19 Average grain yields (lbs/ac) and seed size under single and double management systems for the resistance to three nematode strains in Advanced blackeye trials at KAC, 1994. a – indicates the top-yielding group based on statistical analysis.
Entry Grain yield lbs/ac Seed weight mg/seed RKN resistance non-aggr RKN resistance aggr RKN resistance javanica
CB-46 3481a 216 R S S
CB-5 2851 255 R S S
H8-8-1N 3208a 234 R S S
H8-8-6 2709 225 R R R
H8-8-13 2677 211 R S S
H8-8-15 2882 229 R R R
H8-8-27 3063a 231 R R R
H8-8-35 2907 228 R R R
H8-8-35 2907 228 n/a n/a n/a
LSD(.05) 472 9 n/a
CV(%) 16 3.9

 

Year – 1995

Table 20 Grain Yields (cwt/ac) in Uniform Trial at Stanislaus and Shafter, 1995
Entry Stanislaus Shafter Mean
H8-8-27 24.5 55.5 40.2
H8-8-15 23.0 55.2 39.1
CB46 20.8 55.9 38.4
CB88 11.5 54.3 32.9
LSD(.05) 3.4 3.8 2.5
CV(%) 14.8 6.1 8.5
Table 21 Grain Yields (cwt/ac) of UCR Advanced Blackeye Trials at UCR, 1995.
Entry Origin Single Flush Double Flush Mean
H8-8-27 CB5/CB3//1393 22.3 29.6 26.0
H8-8-15 CB5/CB3//1393 23.9 29.2 26.6
CB46 CB5/CB3//PI1166146 23.3 25.9 24.6
CB88 CB5/CB3//PI1166146 24.5 29.6 27.1
LSD(.05) 2.1 NS 3.4 n/a
CV(%) 8 14 16
Table 22 Grain Yields (cwt/ac) of UCR Advanced Blackeye Trials at KAC, 1995.
Entry Origin Single Flush Double Flush Mean
H8-8-27 CB5/CB3//1393 38.3 42.8 41.3
H8-8-15 CB5/CB3//1393 38.3 41.9 40.1
CB46 CB5/CB3/PI1166146 31.7 47.2 39.4
CB88 CB5/CB3/PI1166146 34.0 44.4 39.2
LSD(.05) 4.6 8.0 4.8 n/a
CV(%) 12 16 15

 

Table 23 Rootknot nematode infestation from UCR Advanced Blackeye Trials at KAC, 1995. 
Line Nematodes Non-aggres Nematodes aggres Nematodes M.jay. Fusarium Race 3 Fusarium Race 4 Heat
H8-8-27 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
H8-8-15 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
CB46 Yes No No Yes Yes No
CB5 Yes No No No Yes No
Notes: Types of RKN; Non-aggres = Non-aggressive M. incognita – not able to overcome standard ‘Rk’ gene resistance.
aggres = strain of M. incognita – able to overcome ‘Rk’ resistance

 

Table 24 Seed Size (mg/seed) from UCR Advanced Blackeye Trials at KAC and UCR, 1995.
Line Kearney Riverside Mean
H8-8-27 208 215 212
H8-8-15 207 209 208
CB46 203 201 202
CB88 216 210 213
LSD(.05) 11 19 11
CV(%) 4.4 7.7 6.3
Table 25 Comparison of seed size (mg/seed)  of high-yielding line, at locations KAC and UCR, 1994 and 1995.
Line 1994 1995 Mean
H8-8-27 231 212 222
H8-8-15 229 208 219
CB46 216 202 209
CB88 231 213 222
LSD(.05) 6 11 n/a
Table 26 Mean Yields of high-yielding lines at locations KAC, UCR, SHAFT and STANI, 1994 and 1995.
Line Mean
H8-8-27 33
H8-8-15 33
CB46 33
CB88 32

Year – 1996

Table 27 Grain Yields (cwt/ac) of high yielding breeding lines and check varieties CB46 and CB88 in 5 uniform trials and Individual Seed Weight from single flush trial at KAC–1996. 
Entry Shafter Tulare Kearney double Kearney single Westside Mean Seed weight mg/seed
H8-8-27 53.1 42.6 38.0 26.1 24.5 36.9 213
H8-8-15 45.8 40.3 33.3 23.9 23.8 33.4 207
CB46 46.6 49.1 40.5 25.5 24.6 37.3 215
CB88 46.2 41.1 37.0 23.4 20.9 33.7 215
LSD.05 8.3 8.1 NS 2.7 1.4 2.7 7
CV(%) 11.7 12.5 13.8 7.7 4.0 12.1 2.1
Table 28 Grain Yields (cwt/ac), root-knot galling scores and number of nematodes (juveniles per liter of soil) of high yielding UCR blackeye breeding lines in a field at KAC and at the Muller Farm-Chance Field, Stanislaus Co. that are infested with Rk gene virulent stains of M.javanica and M.incognita. Fusarium wild races 3 and 4 from the Chance Field alone, 1996. 
Entry Grain Yield (KAC) Grain Yield (Muller) Galling (KAC) Galling (Muller) No. juveniles (KAC) No. juveniles (Muller) Resistance Nematode Fusarium Wilt
H8-8-27 21.1 21.0 2.3 2.1 1672 328 Rk+ 3 & 4
H8-8-15 19.9 23.1 1.6 2.0 1061 239 Rk+ 3 & 4
CB46 21.2 16.5 4.9 4.7 1833 572 Rk 3
CB88 22.9 10.2 4.5 5.1 2478 572 Rk 3
LSD.05 2.9 3.1 0.6 0.9 750 NS n/a n/a
Table 29 Grain Yields (cwt/ac) and seed size (mg/seed) of high-yielding UCR blackeye breeding lines and checks (C46 and CB88) under single and double flush management at UCR, 1996.
Entry Grain Yield (Single) Grain Yield (Double) Seed Size (Single) Seed Size (Double) Means Yield Means Seed Size
H8-8-27 20.8 32.7 223 249 26.8 236
H8-8-15 22.4 36.1 226 245 29.3 236
CB46 24.7 34.9 223 234 29.8 228
CB88 22.7 34.7 226 232 28.7 229
LSD.05 2.5 NS 9 9 2.5 6
CV(%) 7.5 9.0 2.7 2.5 8.7 2.6

 

Table 30 Grain Yields of promising blackeye breeding lines and checks (CB46 and CB88) over years and locations in the Central Valley. Overall mean includes data from Tulare and Westside Field Station trials, 1996.
Entry Shafter mean Yield 1995 and 1996 Stanislaus mean Yield 1995 and 1996 Kearney Mean Yield 1995 and 1996 Overall Mean
H8-8-27 55 23 34 36
H8-8-15 50 23 33 34
CB46 51 19 36 36
CB88 50 11 33 31
Table 31 Summary of grain yields (cwt/ac) of selected blackeye bean breeding lines and check cultivars (CB46 and CB88) from single-flush and double-flush trials at KAC, 1994, 1995, 1996.
Entry 1994 Single flush 1994 Double flush 1995 Single flush 1995 Double flush 1996 Single flush 1996 Double flush Mean Single Mean Double
H8-8-27 30.5 39.2 31.7 47.2 25.5 40.5 29.2 42.3
H8-8-15 25.1 35.5 34.0 44.4 23.4 37.0 27.5 39.0
CB46 25.9 31.8 38.3 42.8 23.9 33.3 29.4 36.0
CB88 24.0 37.3 38.3 41.9 26.1 38.0 29.5 39.1
LSD.05 2.4 NS 4.6 8.0 2.7 NS 2.2 4.2
CV(%) 15 16 12 16 8 14 10 13

Year – 1997

Table 32 Grain yield, bean weight and bean quality grade of selected H8-8-27 cowpea breeding line in a Strip Trial near Wasco, CA, 1997.
 Entry Grain Yield
(Dirt Wt) Cwt/ac
Grain Yield
(Clean Wt) Cwt/ac
Clean Out % Bean Size
Gm/100 seeds
Total
Damage (%)
Splits Grade
H8-8-27 49 44 8.1 24.1 2.0 0.3 UN No. 1
CB46 48 44 7.7 21.7 4.2 0.3 US No. 3
Table 33 Grains yield of selected H8-8-27 cowpea breeding line in Uniform Trials, 1997.
Entry Westside Riverside Tulare Shafter Mean
H8-8-27 1790 3491 2840 4446 3147
CB46 1990 3772 3769 5231 3638
LSD(.05) NS 472 302 NS 241
CV(%) 11.4 7.8 7.0 16.6 11.3
Table 34 Grain Yield and bean size of selected H8-8-27 cowpea breeding line and check (C46) at Shafter and KAC, 1997.
Entry Shafter Mean Yield 1995, 1996, and 1997 Kearney mean Yield 1994, 1995, 1996, and 1997 Overall Mean
H8-8-27 51 35 42
H8-8-15 51 33 41
Seed size
CB46 n/a n/a 21.1
CB88 n/a n/a 22.1
Table 35 Grain Yields and rating for ‘greenness’ after the first pod plush of selected H8-8-27 cowpea breeding line and check (C46) in Uniform Trials at UCR and Tulare, 1997.
Entry Riverside Yield Riverside Greenness Tulare Yield Tulare Greenness Mean Yield Means Greenness
H8-8-27 3491 0 2840 0.7 3166 0.4
CB46 3772 0 3769 2.2 3771 1.1
LSD.05 472 n/a 699 n/a 302 n/a
CV(%) 7.8 n/a 7.0 n/a 7.6 n/a

1998 – Uniform Blackeye Trials

Table 36 Grain yields (lb/ac) H8-8-27 and check (CB46) in Uniform Blackeye Trials, 1998.
Entry Shafter Tulare Kearney Riverside Mean
H8-8-27 5156 4967 4629 3113 4466
CB46 4732 5178 4268 2938 4271
LSD(.05) 521 478 806 529 295
CV(%) 8 6 13 13 10
Table 37 Individual seed weights (grams/100 seeds) and % split seedcoat in Uniform Blackeye Trials, 1998.
Entry Shafter Tulare Kearney Riverside Mean % Split
H8-8-27 22.8 4967 22.6 24.9 23.0 13
CB46 22.6 5178 21.9 25.8 23.0 18
LSD.05 1.3 478 1.1 1.7 0.7 6
CV(%) 4 6 3 5 4 42
Table 38 Effect of row spacing and play type on yield and yield contributing traits of cowpea lines at UCR, 1998.
Genotype Spacing Yield HI % Seed weight g/100 seed Seeds/pod Pods/peduncle
Compact type
H8-8-27 30″ 3642 47.0 24.7 8.4 1.7
n/a 40″ 3407 50.6 24.6 8.7 1.5
n/a 40″ x 2 4111 47.1 23.8 8.4 1.5
n/a Mean 3721 48.2 24.4 8.5 1.6
CB46 30″ 3583 47.0 23.6 8.5 2.1
n/a 40″ 3081 45.8 24.1 8.3 1.9
n/a 40″ x 2 3692 42.7 24.2 8.6 1.6
n/a Mean 3665 45.2 24.0 8.5 1.9
Table 39 Effect of row spacing and plant type on yield and yield contributing traits of cowpea genotypes at Shafter, 1998.
Genotype Spacing Yield HI % Seed weight g/100 seed Seeds/pod Pods/peduncle
Compact type
H8-8-27 30″ 2717 48 23.8 8.4 2.1
n/a 40″ 2399 48.1 23.3 8.8 2.2
n/a 40″ x 2 2643 48.2 23.7 8.0 2.0
n/a Mean 2587 48.1 23.6 8.4 2.1
CB46 30″ 2472 42.0 23 9.5 1.9
n/a 40″ 2328 45.5 21.9 8.0 2.0
n/a 40″ x 2 2498 44.0 23.3 8.1 1.8
n/a Mean 2432 43.8 22.8 8.5 1.9

Year – 1999

Table 40 Performance of CB27 compared to checks CB5 and CB46 for disease (Fusarium), pest (nematode) and Agronomic performance (heat and chill tolerance), 1999.
Entry Fusarium wilt Race 3 Fusarium wilt Race 4 RKN (M. incognita) Avirulent RKN (M. incognita) Virulent RKN (M. javanica) Heat Tolerance Chill Tolerance
CB5 No No Yes No No No No
CB46 Yes No Yes No No No No
CB27 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

Example Using Participatory Varietal Selection

Recent example of Cowpea cultivar released by IITA in parts of Africa using participatory varietal selection.

  1. In Burkina Faso, two improved cowpea varieties developed by IITA have been released.
    1. IT99K-573-2-1 and
    2. IT98K-205-8,
  2. Using participatory varietal selection approach, local farmers and researchers choose varieties from various options after two years of trial in the central and northern regions of Burkina Faso.
  3. Selected varieties are early maturing (60 days), high yielding (2170 kg/ha), resistant to parasitic weed striga along with big size, preferred color, and cooking qualities pertaining to farmers’ taste.
  4. New cowpea varieties also have better adaptability to climate change and can be grown successfully in drier regions with low rainfall.

Important Traits

Example of Participatory market-led cowpea breeding in Sub-Saharan Africa (Tanzania and Malawi) in assigning importance to traits (Fig. 5)

Bar graph showing the relative importance of cowpea traits based on percentage of participating farmers requiring those traits - large seeds with 17% as most important trait, followed by yield and resistance to Allectra with 15%, then early maturity and many and tender leaves next in importance, with 13.2 % and 11.3 %, respectively.
Fig. 5 Important traits of Cowpea required by farmers (%). Illustration by Hella et al, 2013, Merit Research Journal of Agricultural Science and Soil Sciences.

Pathway Based on Preferences

Farmers’ and consumers’ preferences of traits in a variety or cultivar play a critical role on the release and adoption of new varieties. It is important to note that the preferences of the two groups differ and therefore, require the close attention needed to address those preferences (Fig. 6).

infographic on cowpea
Fig. 6 Pathway showing the release of cowpea cultivar based on farmers’ and consumers’ preference along with resistance to Alectra vogelli. Click the image to see a larger version.

Notes to Consider

  1. Alectra vogelii is a parasitic weed that causes considerable damage to cowpea plant by attaching to it and tapping nutrients.
  2. In Tanzania and Malawi, Alectra is one of the major weed growing in almost all cowpea growing areas.
  3. In Figure 4 is shown important traits of cowpea required by farmers. Out of 11 traits used in selection of best cowpea lines by farmers, only five traits (brown seed color, white seed color, good taste, large seed, many leaves and tender leaves) are specific to the final consumer, while the other six traits (early maturity, high yield, resistance to Alectra, resistance to diseases, tolerant to pest, drought tolerance) are agronomic traits. Large seed size is the most important trait from marketing perspective, whereas high yield, early maturity, and resistance to A. vogelli are the main agronomic traits which are the deciding criteria used by farmers to select varieties for growing on their farm.
  4. In Figure 5 is shown an example of value chain approach used to develop cultivars (for example-IT99K-573-2-1)
  5. This approach resolves biases and takes care of farmers, consumers and market preference and will not let breeders effort go waste like in past where outstanding varieties with excellent agronomic traits failed due to inability to satisfy needs of farmers, consumers and market at the same time.

Marker-Assisted Selection

Marker-assisted selection approaches are being developed in cowpea with high-density marker maps and SNP markers becoming available. As cowpea is gaining acreage globally more investment is being made for breeding and marker development. This will assist in further development of MAS in cowpea. Genetic loci controlling important pest and disease resistance genes and agronomic traits have been placed on the genetic map (for example, Kelly et al, 2003). Closely linked markers to some of the biotic traits have been identified (Gowda et al., 2002). Most of these traits are governed by major genes and are potentially good candidates for MAS. Along with MAS for simply inherited traits, the genomic selection approach offers usefulness in future breeding efforts. Currently, joint efforts are being made by IITA, Bean/Cowpea Collaborative Research Support Program (Bean/Cowpea CRSP), advanced laboratories in the USA, Australia, African Agricultural Technology Foundation (AATF), Network for Genetic Improvement of Cowpea for Africa (NGICA) and Monsanto Corporation to exploit biotechnology tools to complement conventional breeding methods for improving resistance to diseases and insects.

References

Abate T., A.D. Alene, D. Bergvinson, B. Shiferaw, S. Silim, A. Orr, and S. Asfaw. 2012. Tropical Grain Legumes in Africa and South Asia: Knowledge and Opportunities. PO Box 39063, Nairobi, Kenya: International Crops Research Institute for the Semi Arid Tropics. 112 pp. ISBN: 978-92-9066-544-1. Order Code: BOE 056.

Baudoin J.P., and R. Maréchal. 1985. Genetic diversity in Vigna. In: Singh SR, Rachie KO (eds) Cowpea research, production, and utilization. Wiley, New York, pp 3-11.

Ehlers J.D. and A.E. Hall. 1996. Genotypic Classification of Cowpea Based on Response to Heat and Photoperiod. Crop Science 36: 673-679.

Hella, J.P., T. Chilongo, A.M. Mbwag, J. Bokosi, V. Kabambe, C. Riches, and C.L. Massawe. 2013. Participatory market-led cowpea breeding in Sub-Saharan Africa: Evidence pathway from Malawi and Tanzania. Merit Research Journal of Agricultural Science and Soil Sciences (ISSN:2350-2274) Vol. 1(2) pp. 011-018.

Henriet, J., G.A. van EK, S.F. Blade, and B.B. Singh. 1997. Quantitative assessment of traditional cropping systems in the Sudan savanna of Northern Nigeria, I. Rapid survey of prevalent cropping systems. Samara Journal of Agricultural Research 14: 37-45.

Heuzé V.Tran G., 2015. Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) seeds. Feedipedia, a programme by INRAE, CIRAD, AFZ and FAO. https://www.feedipedia.org/node/232 Last updated on May 11, 2015, 14:31

Kelly, J.D., Gepts P, Miklas PN, Coyne DP. (2003). Tagging and mapping of genes and QTL and molecular marker-assisted selection for traits of economic importance in bean and cowpea. Field Crops Res. 82:135-154.

Olufajo, O.O., and B.B. Singh. 2002. Advances in cowpea cropping systems research. Pp 267-277 in challenges and opportunities for enhancing sustainable cowpea production. Proceedings of world cowpea conference III held at International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA), Ibadan, Nigeria. 4-8 September 2000. IITA. Ibadan Nigeria.

Singh, B.B., O.L. Chamblis, and B. Sharma. 1997. Recent advances in cowpea breeding. Pages 3049 in Advances in Cowpea Research, edited by B.B. Singh, D.R. Mohan Raj, K.E. Dashiell, and L.E.N. Jackai. IITA, and Japan International Research Centre for Agricultural Sciences (JIRCAS) copublication. Available at IITA, Ibadan, Nigeria.

Timko, M.P., J.D. Ehlers, and P.A. Roberts: Cowpea. In Genome Mapping and Molecular Breeding in Plants, Pulses, Sugar and Tuber Crops. Volume 3. Edited by Kole C. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 2007: 49-68.

 

How to cite this chapter: Singh, A. K., T. Mamo, A. Singh. & A. A. Mahama. (2023). Cowpea Breeding. In W. P. Suza, & K. R. Lamkey (Eds.), Crop Improvement. Iowa State University Digital Press. 

License

Icon for the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

Chapter 9: Cowpea Breeding Copyright © 2023 by Arti Singh; Teshale Mamo; Asheesh Singh; and Anthony A. Mahama is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, except where otherwise noted.