Evolutionary and Behavior Genetics
Sonja Ann Miller; Lumen Learning; and Diana Lang
- Describe the evolutionary perspective
The fundamentals of the evolutionary perspective
One very influential approach in understanding human development is the evolutionary perspective, the final developmental perspective that we will consider. This perspective seeks to identify behavior that is the result of our genetic inheritance from our ancestors. Evolutionary psychology is a theoretical approach in the social and natural sciences that examines psychological structure from a modern evolutionary perspective. It seeks to identify which human psychological traits are evolved adaptations – that is, the functional products of natural selection or sexual selection in human evolution.[1]
David M. Buss is an evolutionary psychologist at the University of Texas at Austin, theorizing and researching human sex differences in mate selection. The primary topics of his research include male mating strategies, conflict between the sexes, social status, social reputation, prestige, the emotion of jealousy, homicide, anti-homicide defenses, and—most recently—stalking. All of these are approached from an evolutionary perspective.
In the distant future I see open fields for far more important researches. Psychology will be based on a new foundation, that of the necessary acquirement of each mental power and capacity by gradation. — Darwin, Charles (1859). . p. 488 – via Wikisource
Evolutionary psychology has its historical roots in Charles Darwin’s theory of natural selection (Figure 1). In The Origin of Species, Darwin predicted that psychology would develop an evolutionary basis, and that a process of natural selection creates traits in a species that are adaptive to its environment.
Using Darwin’s arguments, evolutionary approaches claim that one’s genetic inheritance not only determine such physical traits as skin and eye color, but also certain personality traits and social behaviors. For example, some evolutionary developmental psychologists suggest that behavior such as shyness and jealousy may be produced in part by genetic causes, presumably because they helped increase the survival rates of human’s ancient relatives.[2][3][4]
Lorenz and Imprinting
The evolutionary perspective draws heavily on the field of ethology, which examines the ways in which our biological makeup influences our behavior. The primary proponent of ethology was Konrad Lorenz, who discovered that newborn geese are genetically pre-programmed to become attached to the first moving object they see after birth. Lorenz’s work led developmentalists to consider the ways in which human behavior might reflect inborn genetic patterns. Working with geese, he investigated the principle of imprinting, the process by which some nidifugous birds (i.e. birds that leave their nest early) bond instinctively with the first moving object that they see within the first hours of hatching. Although Lorenz did not discover the topic, he became widely known for his descriptions of imprinting as an instinctive bond.
In psychology and ethology, imprinting is any kind of phase-sensitive learning (learning occurring at a particular age or a particular life stage) that is rapid and apparently independent of the consequences of behavior (Figure 2). It was first used to describe situations in which an animal or person learns the characteristics of some stimulus, which is therefore said to be “imprinted” onto the subject. Imprinting is hypothesized to have a critical period.
Behavioral Genetics
The evolutionary perspective encompasses one of the fastest-growing areas within the field of lifespan development: behavioral genetics. Behavioral genetics is a field of scientific research that uses genetic methods to investigate the nature and origins of individual differences in behavior and studies the effects of heredity on behavior. Behavioral geneticists strive to understand how we might inherit certain behavioral traits and how the environment influences whether we actually displayed those traits. It also considers how genetic factors may influence psychological disorders such as schizophrenia, depression and substance abuse.[5][6][7]
Watch, stanford professor and author of Why Zebras Don’t Get Ulcers, Robert Sapolsky, describes how our history and biology influence our behavior. This tour of our individual and collective history provides an enlightening overview of behavioral genetics.
Criticisms of the Evolutionary Perspective
Try It
- behavioral genetics: one of the fastest-growing areas within the field of lifespan development and studies the effects of heredity on behavior
- ethology: the study of behavior through a biological lens
- evolutionary psychology: a field of study that seeks to identify behavior that is a result of our genetic inheritance from our ancestors
- imprinting: in psychology and ethology, imprinting is any kind of phase-sensitive learning (learning occurring at a particular age or a particular life stage) that is rapid and apparently independent of the consequences of behavior
- This chapter was adapted from Lumen Learning's Lifespan Development, developed by Sonja Ann Miller and available under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license. Portions of the Lumen text were adapted from Wikipedia. ↵
- Buss, D. M. (2003). The Evolution of Desire: Strategies of Human Mating. BasicBooks ↵
- Buss, A. H. (2012) Pathways to individuality: evolution and development of personality traits. Washington, DC: American psychological Association ↵
- Easton, J. A., Schipper, L. D., & Shackelford, T. K. (2007). Morbid jealousy from an evolutionary psychological perspective. Evolution and Human Behavior: Official Journal of the Human Behavior and Evolution Society, 28(6), 399–402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2007.05.005 ↵
- Ellis, B. J., & Bjorklund, D. F. (Eds.). (2004). Origins of the social mind: Evolutionary psychology and child development. Guilford Publications. ↵
- Rembis, M. A. (2009). (Re)Defining disability in the ‘genetic age’: behavioral genetics, ‘new’ eugenics and the future of impairment. Disability & Society, 24(5), 585–597. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687590903010941 ↵
- Plomin, R., DeFries, J. C., Knopik, V. S., & Neiderhiser, J. M. (2016). Top 10 replicated findings from behavioral genetics. Perspectives on Psychological Science: A Journal of the Association for Psychological Science, 11(1), 3–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691615617439 ↵
- Bjorklund, D. (2006). Mother knows best: Epigenetic inheritance, maternal effects, and the evolution of human intelligence. Developmental Review: DR, 26(2), 213–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2006.02.007 ↵
- Baptista, T., Aldana, E., Angeles, F., & Beaulieu, S. (2008). Evolution theory: an overview of its applications in psychiatry. Psychopathology, 41(1), 17–27. https://doi.org/10.1159/000109951 ↵
- Del Giudice, M. (2015). Self-regulation in an evolutionary perspective. In G. H. E. Gendolla, M. Tops, & S. L. Koole (Eds.), Handbook of biobehavioral approaches to self-regulation (pp. 25–41). Springer Science + Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-1236-0_3 ↵